1 September - The Hawker Lightweight Road Test

Harry Hawker and Tom Sopwith, both associated more with aviation than bikes, produced motorcycles with the Hawker name between 1920 and 1924, though Harry died while flying an aircraft in July 1921.

The Motor Cycle published its road test of the 2½ hp Hawker Two-Stroke Lightweight in 1921.

The bike was designed and manufactured H. G. Hawker Engineering Co., Ltd.as ‘a comparatively inexpensive and extremely simple lightweight motor cycle’.

Regarding the Hawker’s design; a certain amount of maintenance is expected of the owner, clearly:

“In the case of the Hawker lightweight, the design is original in many respects, and the ease of maintenance has been brought down to an extremely simple item for the inexpert person. For example, the lubrication system of the engine has no working parts, is entirely automatic in action, and one filling of oil lasts 500 miles. Then again, the speed gear consists of two primary chains running over sprockets of different sizes which are” engaged by dog clutches located within a miniature “gear” box, while decarbonisation is reduced to the simplest of jobs - due to the detachable head - an important point in two-stroke engines."

Standards for judging performance were a bit different in the early twentieth century. A bike being able to get up any hill being an important consideration on any test:

"Our run was taken through ordinary country roads at average speeds from 15 to 30 m.p.h., and the first noticeable point in the machine’s behaviour was the good steering qualities and really comfortable saddle. It is possible to ride “hands off” without side sway, and pot-holes do not affect steering. We found that the engine had enough power for the average hill on top gear, and at 25 - 30 m.p.h. the unit runs smoothly, and with a nice reserve of power. No signs at any time of overheating were revealed during our run ; and for hills of some severity, such as are often found away from the main road, the lower gear provides all the climbing powers required, as has been proved in recent trials.’

As always though, it’s horses for courses. Both of them:

“Our test of the Hawker also included some city traffic work to and from the office, and the machine proved to be nippy and manageable in town traffic, the twin rear brakes proving efficient in use, on dry roads at any rate. It is in traffic work that a light solo mount scores, for the test specimens are so handy and easy to manipulate.”

Another word about those all-important practicalities of the ‘modern’ motor cycle:

“The Hawker is an essentially no-trouble lightweight. The flywheel magneto is of very robust construction, and in the event of the engine being taken down, the timing of the magneto cannot be carried out wrongly on reassembly. The chains of the speed gear are on the opposite side of the engine to the flywheel, and, on removal of the cast aluminium chain case, are very accessible and easily adjusted. As mentioned before. the lubrication system is entirely automatic - it feeds oil under pressure to the big end of the connecting rod, and there is no drip feed to watch when riding; while in regard to the machine, apart from the engine and transmission, the only points in the frame that require lubricating are the main spindle of the front forks and the wheel hubs.”

The Blue 'Un verdict:

“Generally speaking, we were very pleased with the behaviour of the Hawker, and at £60 it represents really good value for the person who has limited means and requires a simple and easily-looked-after mount. During the 100 odd miles of our run, the oil consumption was one-third of a pint, which is equivalent to 2,400 m.p.g., and petrol consumption about 95 m.p.g.; the first figure is excellent and the second well up to the average.”

So, it’s practical but about as exciting as a Honda CB250N.

4 Likes

WER 575 T. My CB250N. Great little bike took me to work for 5 years with nothing but spark plugs and tyres. Bought it for £150 and sold it for £250, cheapest biking of my life. Sorry!

2 Likes