Triumph Thunderbird Sport

Has anybody out there got a T’bird Sport? I’m thinking of buying one but they are few and far between for sale, especially up here in Scotland.

I have a few queries about the Sport - are there any weak points I should be aware of?

What is the actual seat height - I’ve seen it listed as 790mm / 31.1 inches - does that sound right?

The early ones have a 3-2 silencer on the RH side, the later ones have a 2-1 on the RH side and a 1-1 on the LH side. Is one better or more desirable than the other?

Any idea when the valve clearances need to be checked - and is it a particularly big (i.e. expensive!) job?

I’d be grateful for any info you can let me have.

Hi, thanks for the link. I have seen this review before and it doesn’t really answer all my questions about the Sport variant as it majors on the standard T’bird. There is another review here on the Sport which goes into more detail.
1998 Triumph Thunderbird Sport
I’d welcome any views that Sport-owning members of this forum have on the bike, before I commit to actually viewing and trying out a bike.

Thanks in advance!

I’ve got a late (V reg) T’bird Sport and LOVE it! Abso bloody lootly LOVE IT!

In many ways it’s the most “accessible” of the T300s in the sense that, although it is, as far as I know, fundamentally the same large diameter spine frame; welded on rear monoshock subframe and the T3 series motor, the machine feels - subjectively - more compact, lighter and lower than the rest of my motley collection of ‘clunkers’. The seat height is definitely and noticeably lower than the ‘standard’ Trident/Trophy/Speed Triple etc. variants of the T300 but I have NO idea how they manage that as the wheel sizes do not appear to be vastly different to the cast wheels of the other T3 range bikes. It’s probably a combination of a slightly more sculptured seat foam and base and, perhaps, slightly lower rear subframe …. but that’s personal conjecture.

As much as I love ALL my T3s, I can’t deny that the TBS is/was the ‘go to’ when I’ve got more than one on the road - didn’t happen AT ALL last year as a result of ‘other’ biking commitments - and it’s largely down to the ‘manageability’ of the machine - wider, tubular bars, slightly lower pegs(?) and sculpted seat all make it seem easier and safer to manhandle. Bear in mind I’m shrinking in height from an optimistic 5’5” with an even more optimistic 29” inside leg measurement (and you can stuff off if you ‘re expecting that in metric!!) I can get the soles of both feet down though don’t think I could quite flatfoot it. It also - again subjectively - feels much lighter than the Tridents, Speeds, etc., though I’d find it hard to rationalise or explain that subjective feeling.

You do have to bear in mind that these bikes have been out of production for more than 20 years now (I think the Thunderbirds were produced up until 2004 but the T5 series was introduced in about 1998/9 wasn’t it?) so genuine, factory spares availability is abysmal and many of us swim in the shark infested waters of a limited stock of secondhand or NOS spares/replacements supplies. The Bay of all Evil may not be your friend but it will be a frequent companion on your hunting forays for spares. Sprint Manufacturing is good for some stuff, including carburation spares, but genuine factory stuff is the proverbial rocking horse poo.

As far as I know the three into two stacked or three into two individual exhaust/silencers arrangement was purely styling (bit of the Craig VETTER type styling to the two ‘stacked’ silencers perhaps?) so the only viable advantage of one against the other might be the argument for accessibility to the left hand side of the rear for the stacked system bikes. No big deal and my personal preference for symmetry is definitely better served by the later style.

As a T300 variant the engine specs are broadly similar across the range so I THINK valve clearances checks/adjustments are the same (12,000 miles?) but the T’bird; Legend etc., has a lower horsepower output so I think it’s probably not quite as critical as it might be on, say, a Speed Triple or Daytona. Cost? Not sure but I’d guess on budgeting for 3 to 4 hours labour and a few replacement shims? That’s an uneducated guess, though so worth checking with your local, go-to mechanic. Sorry, Technician.

They are really good bikes to own and ride and the Sport variant seems to be the best equipped of them all - it’s also (albeit subjectively) the best looking …. especially if you like the symmetry of two disks; two silencers; two clocks, etc. :wink:

Good luck with your search for one - get the right one and the rewards will be as handsome as the bike itself.

2 Likes

Very handsome. Proper carburettors and all. Pre-dates all this electronic nonsense too. Interesting…

2 Likes

Thanks v much AdieP, that’s just the sort of feedback I was hoping for.

I’ve currently got a Legend, the second one I’ve owned. It’s a 1998 bike with just 3,500 on the clock, it sat in somebody’s private collection for years so it had to be extensively recommissioned last year before being rideable. I love the engine, great sound and pulls like a train in any gear. BUT, I’m finding the seating position, with a 28.5" seat height and somewhat forward-set pegs, not good for my old back. I didn’t have the same problem with my previous Legend so I reckon my back has got worse over the past few years. All my other bikes (Speed Twin 1200, Striple 675, Thruxton 900 and Firestorm) have relatively “sportier” riding positions with lower and slightly set-back pegs, so I reckon the T’bird Sport will suit me better than the Legend. I’m about 5’ 8" so I should be able to flat foot on the Sport with a 31" seat, I’m fine with all my other bikes.

I prefer the look of the later Sports with a silencer either side, though I’d take one of the earlier bikes with the 3-2 on the RHS if it was in good nick. In particular I like the white / orange tank combo you get on later bikes. I saw one for sale in Aberdeen late last year and was tempted even though it had 32k on the clock. Of course it went quickly so I’ll have to widen my search. £5k gets you a good one from a dealer, the cheapest I’ve seen one recently is about £2.9k but that’s from a private seller.

Thanks again for the feedback, I’ll keep looking for a good example of the Sport.

1 Like

You are very welcome, Jimbo. It’s a pity you’re at the other end of the country otherwise you’d have been welcome to come over and give mine a try. I do, still, keep my eyes open for one of the Orange with black panel bikes but, like you, I prefer low mileage examples and they’re very definitely getting harder to find. This one is definitely getting my interest fired up……

https://www.autotrader.co.uk/bike-details/202602280294544?advertising-location=at_bikes&calc-deposit=400&calc-term=48&calc-mileage=6000

I feel a phone call coming on……….

P.S. I meant to say that I’ll try to get a tape measure out and give you a ‘real world’ (but rough) idea of actual seat height on my bike when I get a chance.

This should get the juices flowing, Jimbo. :wink:

It’s actually a picture of my bike that the previous owner had taken by an acquaintance. I think this shot gives you an idea of how the seat shape probably contributes to the “real world feel” of a lower seat height.

Good luck with your search - it should be well worth the wait.

3 Likes

Yep, that’s the colour scheme I really like. I’m jealous! If you ever think of selling it - let me know!

I did see that one on Autotrader and had a look. It looks ok and Warrington is only about 170 miles / 3.5 miles from me. I might be tempted to go and have a look at it.

3.5 hours, not miles! :rofl:

2 Likes

A couple of pics of my Legend resting in the sunshine at the top of the Lammermuirs after a run up from East Linton on 4th March. Old girl but she can still pick up her skirts and get a move on!


8 Likes

Definitely a proper motorbike.